Sarja E. HUMAK Publications

Sarjassa julkaistaan vieraskielisiä tutkimuksia, raportteja ja HUMAKin edustamien toimialojen kannalta kansainvälisesti kiinnostavia asiantuntija-artikkeleita.

  • Constance DeVereaux: (Ed.): Cultural Management and its Boundaries: Past, Present, and Future (2011) is the final volume of the series Cultural Management and the State of the Field. It extends the conversations a group of researchers, educators, and practitioners began and developed in Volumes 1 and 2 exploring the practices, theories, methods, history, issues, challenges, opportunities, and events of cultural management as a field. The present volume, as its title indicates, is concerned with where the field has been, is now, and where it is going in the future.
     
  • Eeva Salmi: Linguistic Turns in Teaching of the Deaf in Finland (2010). The text examines the social development of the status of Deaf people in Finland, through changes that have taken place in the education system. The outstanding themes are the socitiety´s ambition to define the linguistic identity of the Deaf on the basis of the needs of the the non-deaf, and the gradual formation of the culture and linguistic awareness of the Deaf community.
     
  • Constance DeVereaux & Pekka Vartiainen (Ed.) The Science and Art of Cultural Management. Second in a series of reports on Cultural Management and the State of the Field. Specialists, including researchers, academics, and practitioners, gathered in spring 2008 for a two-day symposium in Helsinki, to examine the role of science, research, and therory in the practice and pedagogy of cultural management, with the overall aim of exploring the boundaries of the field.

    Contents
    C. DeVereaux: Introduction
    The Science and Art of Cultural Management: Group Discussions

    1. What does science mean in cultural management? Should there be more or less science?
    2. What characteristics does cultural management have that would identify it as discipline, practice, or field?
    3. Are there theories and methodologies specific to cultural management? Should there be? What are the significant theories and methodologies that it has borrowed, and are they appropriate?
    4. Is there a central core of knowledge that everyone in cultural management should know?
    5. What is the relationship between cultural management and cultural policy?
    6. What are the objectives of pursuing cultural management as a discipline?
    Summary

Jaa sisältö Jaa